Tubular heater/exchanger case study: recap and guidelines on model complexity choice

Antonio Sala, UPV

Difficulty: *** ,       Relevance: PIC,      Duration: 16:31

*Enlace a Spanish version

Materials:    [ IntercConclusionsEnglish.pdf]

Summary:

This video is, in a way, the conclusion of the tubular heat exchanger/heater case study discussed in the videos starting with [term1eEN] and continuing in the links/references therein.

It recapitulates the many ways to give a model, from purely “static” (simplest) to nonlinear partial differential equations, through first-order models based on energy balance of the mean temperature.

Excessive model complexity results in computational cost issues, and possibly too complex controllers. Besides, that will never solve problems of unmodeled dynamics (conduction in the metallic piping, turbulence) or parametric errors in heat transfer coefficients, or bandwidth limitations of the instrumentation of a specific application. Therefore, depending on the ratio between the residence time of the fluid and the settling time that is sought in each specific application, the best engineering choice will be a certain “sensible” complexity of the model: more complexity isn’t always better in ‘practical engineering’.

*Link to my [ whole collection] of videos in English. Link to larger [ Colección completa] in Spanish.

© 2024, A. Sala. All rights reserved for materials from authors affiliated to Universitat Politecnica de Valencia.
Please consult original source/authors for info regarding rights of materials from third parties.