Versión de HTML Básico
WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS
Tourism & creative industry . Valencia, July, 11&12th, 2013
154
as a whole, with subsequent improvement in the level of well-being for the
whole neighborhood and, thus, of quality of life and utility of individuals.
This presupposes that all changes arising and endowments stemming from
the processes are positive. On the other hand, the model can be extended
either by introducing conditional restrictions or by considering endogenous
locations.
At last but not least, regarding the urban management, regeneration and
rehabilitation standpoint, the model enables local government and municipal
authorities to better address priority areas of intervention inside a whole
neighborhood and to better achieve sustainable urbanization when carrying
out an urban regeneration and rehabilitation process by providing them and
their partners (public and private sector) a more equitably and efficiently
managing of resources in cultural heritage and historic residential urban
areas.
References
[1]
Schelling T.C. , On the Ecology of Micromotives, The Public Interest
25(1971a) 61-98
[2]
Schelling T.C. Dynamic Models of Segregation, Journal of
Mathematical Sociology,1(2) (1971b) 143-186
[3]
Scheling T.C., Micromotives and Macrobehavior , Norton, New York,
1978.
[4]
Glaeser E.L., Shapiro JM, Urban Growth in the 1990s: Is the city living
back?, Journal of Regional Science 43(1), 2003, 139-165
[5]
Mattos, C.A.. Nuevas teorías del crecimiento económico: Una lectura
desde la perspectiva de los territorios de la periferia. Revista de Estudios
Regionales. Vol. 58 (2000), p. 15-44.
[6]
Lawless, P. Locating and explaining area-based urban initiatives: New
Deal for Communities in England. Environment and Planning C: Government
and Policy. Vol. 2 (2004), p. 383-399.
[7]
Van Oers, R. Towards new international guidelines for the conservation
of historic urban landscapes (HUL)s, City & Time, 3 (3) (2007): 3, pp. 43-51.
[8]
Nijkamp, P. and Riganti, P. Assessing cultural heritage benefits for